Category

Mammography injury sparks civil lawsuit

Mammography injury sparks civil lawsuit

Cancer followed pain and bruising

By Louise Dickson, Times Colonist November 15, 2011

A Victoria woman is suing a mammography technician and the operators of the B.C. Mammography Screening Clinic for negligence after she was injured during a routine mammogram in October 2008.

Joy Ann McKerr's 10day civil trial against CML HealthCare Inc. is expected to begin today in B.C. Supreme Court. McKerr is seeking substantial damages for injuries suffered that she claims accelerated her breast cancer.

On Oct. 3, 2008, when she went to the screening clinic on Richmond Road, McKerr was a healthy 60year-old with no health concerns, said her lawyer, Jacqueline Horton.

This Breast Cancer Screening May Lead to a SHORTER Life...

This Breast Cancer Screening May Lead to a SHORTER Life...

Posted By Dr. Mercola | July 12 2011

Fibrocystic Breast Disease – Treatment and Prevention Alexander Mostovoy, H.D

Fibrocystic Breast Disease – Treatment and Prevention
Alexander Mostovoy, H.D., D.H.M.S., B.C.C.B.

As a clinical breast thermographer I see more and more fibrocystic breast cases than any other abnormality of the breast. Cysts are likely to develop in women ages 30 to 50; however, the youngest patient that I've evaluated was a 12-year-old with multiple cysts in her breasts. In fact, I am seeing this condition increasingly in younger and younger women. One has to ask the question: “what would contribute to the rise of this condition so early in life, and what would happen to these girls and women over the years if they continue on this path”.

The symptoms of fibrocystic breast disease (FBD) may range from mildly annoying in some women to extremely painful in others. The severity of these symptoms may range from month to month in the same woman. Some women feel that their breasts become so painful that they can't bear to touch them and will have trouble sleeping at night due to the pain. This disease itself is not dangerous, but it does complicate breast self-examination since it is difficult to identify a new lump amongst existing ones. Consequently, the probing, squishing, x-raying and routine biopsies that many women experience due to the fibrocystic structure of their breasts may in fact result in more trauma and increase the risk of developing malignancy.

"What They don't Want You To Know About Mammography" By Dr. Mercola

The use of mammograms has dropped following recommendations by a medical task force that women in their 40s may not need to get breast cancer screenings every year. Studies suggest that fewer physicians are recommending annual mammograms for women in their 40s, and that fewer patients in that age group are getting screened.

In November of 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a federal advisory board, said that yearly mammograms should not necessarily be automatic at age 40. They did recommend routine mammography screenings every two years for women ages 50 to 74.

CNN reports:

"Mammograms are less effective in detecting growths in younger women, whose breasts may be denser. The screening gets better with older women because breast tissues change over time. As a result, some women experience false positives, anxiety and unnecessary biopsies because of mammograms, according to data."

Meanwhile, more and more clinical studies are showing that an alternative, noninvasive breast cancer screening test – thermography – could soon become the initial breast screening tool for pre-menopausal women.
Sources:
CNN May 2, 2011
Health News Review Mary 3, 2011
International Seminars in Surgical Oncology April 2005
European Journal of Surgical Oncology June 2010

Dr. Mercola's Comments:

Follow Dr. Mercola on Twitter Follow Dr. Mercola on Facebook

When the 16-member U.S. Preventive Services Task Force said annual mammograms weren't necessary for women under age 50, and that screenings were recommended only every two years after that, the breast cancer community all but fell apart. Protests erupted from surgeons and radiologists to cancer advocacy groups like the American Cancer Society and Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

Since two of the task force's members represent the insurance industry, and since the industry looks to the task force for guidance in what tests insurance will cover, critics claimed that money and conflicts of interest swayed the decision to reduce mammography screening recommendations.

Study of Breast Biopsies Finds Surgery Used Too Extensively

Study of Breast Biopsies Finds Surgery Used Too Extensively
By DENISE GRADY
Published: February 18, 2011

Too many women with abnormal mammograms or other breast problems are undergoing surgical biopsies when they should be having needle biopsies, which are safer, less invasive and cheaper, new research shows.
Enlarge This Image
Kelly Jordan for The New York Times

A study by Dr. Stephen R. Grobmyer, the director of the breast cancer program at the University of Florida in Gainesville, has found that too many surgical biopsies are being performed.
A study in Florida found that 30 percent of the breast biopsies there from 2003 to 2008 were surgical. The rate should be 10 percent or less, according to medical guidelines.

Coment by Dr. Dekel.


This is an interesting article, It seems that the "ivory tower of medicine" is more interested in cutting down the number of "open Biopsies", but completely ignore the fact the 80% of the 1.6 MILION breast biopsies are negative and could have been avoided.

One of the authors states categorically that needle biopsies do not increase the risk of spread of cancer without showing any evidence.

Common sense and multiple anecdotal cases indicate that they do.

Breast Cancer Breakthrough - Cut Your Risk of Death in Half

Breast Cancer Breakthrough - Cut Your Risk of Death in Half
  By Dr. Mercola

Woman with Cancer Awareness RibbonAccording to the National Breast Cancer Foundation, 200,000 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed each year in the US, making it three times more common than other gynecological cancers.

Breast cancer will claim the lives of 40,000 people this year.

What is really disturbing is the speed at which breast cancer rates have risen over the past 5 decades. In 1960, one in twenty women were diagnosed—but today, it is one in seven.

Time to Rethink Your Annual Mammogram?

By Mary Mucci

Three years ago, I reported on a clinical trial of so called thermography by a prominent clinician:  Dr. Rache Simmons of Cornell Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital.  In that report she said that for young women with dense breasts…thermography was a better option {than mammography}.   She also said that infrared digital scanning, which “needed more study,” was able to detect cancer ten years before a mammogram.  But apparently only a few women heard about it. There have been hundreds of other studies on this “new technology,” and for me one stands out above all the rest:

Think before you Pink - Breast Cancer

For the past 25 years, October has been Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM), using pink ribbons. BCAM was actually started by the drug company Astra Zeneca (which manufactures breast cancer drugs) and the pink ribbon originated from the Estee Lauder cosmetics company.

Syndicate content
 

© 2010 DrDekel.com